[kj] '77 and all that - hasil adkins the original DIY punk
fluw
gathering@misera.net
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:08:51 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
<HEAD>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>yep link wray was cited previously..but the ultimate would be...hasil adkins - doesn't get more DIY-attitude than him. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> <BR><BR><BR>-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Devacor@aol.com <BR>Sent: Mar 29, 2004 5:22 PM <BR>To: gathering@misera.net <BR>Subject: Re: [kj] 1977 and all that <BR><BR></DIV><XHTML><XHEAD><XMETA content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv="Content-Type" charset="US-ASCII"><XMETA content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name="GENERATOR"><XBODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:44:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, peter.west410@ntlworld.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT face=Arial>punk<BR>band.If it's about the music then I m sure you can go back in time to the<BR>50s ,there must of been some awful rock band which could be classified as<BR>punk.So its not about the music.It's not about the clothes either, anyone</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV>wouldnt call him quite punk, but you got to think about Link Ray</DIV></BODY>