[kj] happy birthday ADOLF

[iPat]

yes, valid points but the experiment stands on its own and it would be
best to see how it was handled first and subsequently. I seem to
remember it was two different sets of scientists in order to counter
this critisism

On 4/22/05, sade1 <saulomar1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> If you're implying that it was just that the 2nd set of monkeys
> learned it quicker("..w/out any visible..communication.."), may
> it also be that the teachers just/also learned to teach it
> better, quicker the 2nd time round? Or both?? Both are entirely
> possible.
> 
-- 
iPat
live for today, live for tomorrow
"Truth is a pathless land. Man cannot come to it through any
organisation, through any creed, through any dogma, priest or ritual,
nor through any philosophic knowledge or psychological technique. He
has to find it through the mirror of relationship, through the
understanding of the contents of his own mind, through observation and
not through intellectual analysis or introspective dissection..."