[kj] CRASS commercialism!

[The Exorcist]

He does debate. But debate is pointless when you are shown as wrong and won't
admit to it. That's why I mentioned all 3.

Cheers,
Me

At 12:54 AM 6/4/2008, B. Oliver Sheppard wrote:

>Chomsky's extremely open for debate. Look for his debates on Youtube 

>starting with, say, William F Buckley, Jr. 

>(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYlMEVTa-PI) Or Michel Foucault. Or 

>the President of Boston University. Or Alan Dershowitz over Israel. 

>Many of these are on YouTube. Just type "Chomsky debate."

>

>Often the Q&A session after his talks become debates in and of themselves.

>

>One problem is many US media outlets won't have him on for debates. 

>Why? He usually wins.

>

>Pity you don't like him, but no one is perfect, are they? :)

>

>-Oliver

>

>

>The Exorcist wrote:

>>If only he listened to his own advice.

>>

>>I'd think an intellectual would have an open mind and be open to 

>>debate, honesty and admit if he/she was wrong.

>

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is 
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the 
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080604/4cdc4e54/attachment.htm>