[kj] Congrats Obama

[The Exorcist]

Need more water for the Kool-Aid? :)

Cheers,
Me

At 05:42 PM 6/4/2008, bongo wrote:

>you really think Osama (rhymes with Obama) attacked the US???

>have you not seen LOOSE CHANGE? IN PLANE SIGHT? or any of the other 

>911 doco's?

>there is NO WAY that all that was done by foreign darkies... it was

>your LEADERS!!!

>

>WAKE UP!

>

>YOU'RE (WE'RE) ALL FUCKED!!!

>

>

>=)

>

>

>

>On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:06 AM, B. Oliver Sheppard

><bigblackhair at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> > Yeah, Saddam was a thug, but a secular thug, not a religious zealot or

> > Jihadist. he likened himself more to Stalin than to any sort of holy

> > warrior, and thrugh his heavy hand prevented what the US invasion 

> unleashed.

> > In fact, most will probably remember Saddam's right-hand man Tariq Aziz was

> > a Catholic, not even a Muslim.

> >

> > Bin laden and Saddam were at sword points. Bin Laden wanted the ungodly

> > secular regime of Saddam destroyed so that he and his zealots could restore

> > the historic Islamic caliphate to the country. Everyone always asked "Why

> > did bin laden attack the US? What does he want/ WHAT DOES HE WANT?" When bn

> > Laden qute clearly announced in message after message what his 

> demands were.

> > These were and are readily available, translated into English, 

> and newspaper

> > printed them.

> >

> > People in the US apparently did read them, because they preferred to think

> > bin Laden jst "hated freedom" or something. In fact, bin Laden's 3 demands

> > were 1) removal of US bases from Saudi Arabia [which he got, so that's one

> > for Osama] 2) end of US support for Israel, and 3) restoration of Islamic

> > caliphate to its historic place in Baghdad. Bin Laden has one out of 3 of

> > these already, and he's closer to getting the 3rd one now than he was when

> > Hussein kept bin Laden's group, as well as the Kurds and others, 

> suppressed.

> >

> > Now that Turkey, a US ally, is suppressing the Kurds, it's okay. But Saddam

> > doing it? What an evil man.

> >

> > -Oliver

> >

> > ade wrote:

> >>

> >> You know, Saddam was already dealing with religious unrest, bombings,

> >> etc, on his own soil. The ironic outcome being that he was much nearer to

> >> being on 'our' side when it came to Islamist nutfucks terrorising. Whereas

> >> the void will now be filled by well established battle-hardened Islamist

> >> nutfucks. We've trained them up...

> >>

> >>

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

>

>

>

>--

>

>

>"due to a lack of trained trumpeters, the end of the world has been

>postponed indefinitely..."

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is 
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the 
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080604/1d5f706b/attachment.html>