[kj] [KJ] OT: Gaylords

[ade]

I don't think I defended it. I have kids you know. wtf do you think I am?

-----Original Message-----
From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf Of sade1
Sent: 18 June 2008 03:09
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] [KJ] OT: Gaylords




> Ignoring current value systems, it's just a sexual preference


 

  Even then - and even totally independent of all past and present value 

systems - it is criminal violence, meaning, it is Criminal and Violent, with 

no possible justification even when the kid actually enjoys it (which happens, 

too). 

  Keep in mind the damage to the victims. It's always gone on - and excused 

away - because of a total disrespect of the rights and life of the children.

 

 

 

... ... ... ... ... ... 
(looking at the current state of things)

'Save me..                                                
 save me from Tomorrow..                          
 I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...!'   


--- On Tue, 6/17/08, ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:


From: ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [kj] [KJ] OT: Gaylords
To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" <gathering at misera.net>
Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 3:06 PM



> paedophiles




Ignoring current value systems, it's just a sexual preference, so it

would be interesting to see if any markers show up & how. We really

need to do some serious work around peedo's (LOL!) to fnd ways to manage

the urge.



Still, if you were a Rabbi, back in the day, the rulebooks say it's ok

to fuck kids, as long as they're two years old or more. How we've

changed,

eh? Some of it is vile neccesity though - the age of consent in Victorian

England was 13, I guess because people didn't live all that long...



-----Original Message-----

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net

[mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf Of jo

Sent: 17 June 2008 22:57

To: saulomar1 at yahoo.com; A list about all things Killing Joke (the

band!)

Subject: Re: [kj] [KJ] OT: Gaylords









  And yes going with what Milinda* wrote, idiots and assholes and the mates 

who love

them could start testing and extirpating undesirables and other pariah 

fetuses based

on 'gayness.' The shallowness behind that would be amazing.

  Those parents should start with themselves and set the proper example: if 

they don't

match stereotype they're seeking (gay, straight, tall, blue eyed,

blonde,boy 

v. girl, etc.)

 they should exterminate themselves first, because clearly the herd needs 

culling.




::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::




*That was me who suggested that.



Yes I agree that if that's the only sample that they took; it's more 

titillating than scientific.

The ethical implications are massive.  Not just for gays but for others 

too - paedophiles (not associating the two together in any shape or form). 

Would they have a physical brain profile too?



21st Century Phrenology - cool and dangerous.







 



_______________________________________________

Gathering mailing list

Gathering at misera.net

http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering





_______________________________________________

Gathering mailing list

Gathering at misera.net

http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080618/7d844d1e/attachment.html>