[kj] BACKFIRE
Change
crackedmachine at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Oct 8 19:58:45 EDT 2008
McCain chose that retard to appeal to the brainless morons who think America is perfection...
ANOTHER EMPIRE BACKFIRE
goodnight I'm off to play pool and drink hobgoblin
--- On Wed, 8/10/08, Karen Weil <karen.weil at sddt.com> wrote:
> From: Karen Weil <karen.weil at sddt.com>
> Subject: Re: [kj] ot- palin vote
> To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" <gathering at misera.net>
> Date: Wednesday, 8 October, 2008, 6:25 PM
> Hi, Exorcist.
> Look, no offense, really: But what do you think
> McCain's campaign is -- pure substance?
> Do you really, really, really think McCain
> "chose" Palin because she was truly the "best
> candidate"?
> You're a sharp guy, for sure, but you know better than
> that.
> (Look, we all know Biden was a convenient pick for Obama,
> as well -- but at least he makes sense.)
> This sounds harsh, but I have to agree with Alex: She's
> shit.
> And, in case you missed it, Sean Hannity had a blistering
> expose"on Obama's "ties" with William
> Ayers. Don't think the media hasn't been having a
> field day with that.
> With all due respect, I have to disagree with you that
> Obama has gotten the kid-gloves treatment here. He
> hasn't -- nor should he. Neither should McCain.
> (And if you don't think McCain doesn't have his own
> share of skeletons in the closet, you're kidding
> yourself. That doesn't mean McCain is terrible, mind
> you, but it's just the truth.)
> As a much-revered president once said about politics:
> "If you can't stand the heat ..."
> Please have a good day.
>
> Keep on rocking,
>
> k.w.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: The Exorcist
> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [kj] ot- palin vote
>
>
> I always said people's record is fair game. Have you
> looked up Obama's record?
> Have you seen any of the big papers or bloggers go after
> his record?
>
> Nope...
>
> I've yet to hear one thing that he has accomplished.
>
> His entire campaign is based on pure rhetoric. Though I
> am glad that you've come around to
> agreeing about going after ones record and not their
> race/gender and just constant ad hominem attacks.
>
> At 07:12 AM 10/8/2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
>
> "She's been the most vilified and attacked
> person in ages."
>
> Hardly. If anything, she hasn't been attacked
> ENOUGH. Not about her gender or her character, but ABOUT HER
> RECORD.
>
> She's shit.
>
> Alex in NYC
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:18 AM, The Exorcist wrote:
>
>
> Soft on her? She's been the most vilified and
> attacked person in ages.
>
> The Bush Doctrine? What about Joe Biden's massive
> screwup interpreting the constitution? (Wait a second! for
> someone who
> has been in the field for 35 years... screws up so
> bad... Yet no one says a word? AMAZING! This is the friggin
> CONSTITUTION!
> But I've heard nary a peep.)
>
> As I've pointed out before, the interviewer (Mr.
> Gibson) himself did not know the Bush doctrine and
> was immediately smacked down by the individual who
> coined the phrase (Charles Krauthammer).
> I've linked to it in my previous emails when we
> had the whole Palin thing going on.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091202457.html
>
>
> You may disagree all you want Brendan but you are
> dead wrong on this.
> Not to mention that even if you were correct, not
> knowing the constitution (after being in the service for 35
> years)
> or not knowing the bush doctrine - you tell me which
> is more pathetic.
>
> (And I still stand by my opinion that Obama is a
> talentless hack who never accomplished anything and was
> hand-held
> his entire career. Go and read up on how he achieved
> every job title he ever had.)
>
> Judge not lest ye be judged. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Yos
>
>
> At 12:07 AM 10/8/2008, Brendan wrote:
>
> "Given enough time she'd be just as good
> with talking points and gotcha's
> as he is."
>
> That's an assumption I disagree with...unlike
> some others who have gone
> soft on her, I think stuff like not knowing what
> the Bush Doctrine is is
> absolutely pathetic, and provides more evidence
> that she's in there for
> reasons of personality / looks / gender /
> demographic as opposed to talent
> (gasp!).
>
> > Every poll is rigged... Look at the Daily Kos;
> they list every poll
> > out there and tell everyone to go and vote to
> change the numbers.
> > They do this for Obama, Palin, Mccain and
> every other friggin person out
> > there.
> >
> > Look up freep and words similar to that.
> >
> > You ppl. really need to stop getting so fussy.
> :)
> >
> > When the Obama sent out the mass mailer to all
> their supporters to
> > shut down the radio show
> > that hosted some of his detractors I don't
> recall you worrying much
> > about bias. :)
> >
> > BTW, IMHO, her qualifications are just as good
> as Obama (which means
> > ZERO or close to it). He just has his
> > talking points down better after campaigning
> for so long. Given
> > enough time she'd be just as good with
> talking
> > points and gotcha's as he is.
> >
> > Obama is currently in the lead and may very
> well win the election.
> > Life goes on and you prepare for the next one.
> >
> > BTW.... The same thing that those nasty
> "republicans" are doing... is
> > the same thing you are doing now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Me :)
> >
> >
> > At 11:12 AM 10/7/2008, fluw wrote:
> >>Forward--
> >>
> >>PBS has an online poll posted asking if
> Sarah Palin is
> >>qualified. Apparently the Republicans knew
> about this in advance
> >>and are flooding the voting with YES votes.
> I know -- it's only a
> >>poll. But it will be reported on PBS,
> picked up by mainstream media
> >>and can influence undecided voters in swing
> states. Please do two
> >>things -- takes 20 seconds
> >>1) Click on link and vote yourself.
> Here's the link:
> >>
> >><
> http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html >
> http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html
> >>2) Then send this to every single voter
> you know, irregardless of
> >>party affiliation, and urge them to vote
> and pass it on.
> >>The last thing we need is PBS having to say
> their viewers think
> >>Sarah Palin is qualified unless we ALL
> vote.
> >>Thanks.
> >>
>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Gathering mailing list
> >>Gathering at misera.net
> >>
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual
> that reeks of social
> > Darwinism.
> > We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our
> pages. Your loss is someone
> > else's gain, and your gain is someone
> else's loss. Therefore, losers
> > contribute
> > to the society and winners take away from it.
> Being a winner is
> > unethical, while
> > a society of losers is happy and striving as a
> collective. In the
> > spirit of diversity,
> > inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests
> shall have no winners.
> > Everyone is declared a loser, which in our
> book means an ethical team
> > player.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > Gathering mailing list
> > Gathering at misera.net
> >
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that
> reeks of social Darwinism.
> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages.
> Your loss is someone
> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's
> loss. Therefore, losers contribute
> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a
> winner is unethical, while
> a society of losers is happy and striving as a
> collective. In the spirit of diversity,
> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall
> have no winners.
> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means
> an ethical team player.
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks
> of social Darwinism.
> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your
> loss is someone
> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's
> loss. Therefore, losers contribute
> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a
> winner is unethical, while
> a society of losers is happy and striving as a
> collective. In the spirit of diversity,
> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have
> no winners.
> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an
> ethical team player.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
More information about the Gathering
mailing list