[kj] palin ban
Alexander Smith
vassifer at earthlink.net
Tue Sep 9 07:34:11 EDT 2008
"The right wing talk shows never called him a radical Muslim and it
wasn't a focal point."
..... and with that, the heaving burden of accuracy and credibility
left Yos' shoulders with a mighty WHOOOOSH.
Come on out of your cave.
Alex in NYC
On Sep 8, 2008, at 10:12 PM, The Exorcist wrote:
> He's not a Muslim his father had Muslim roots and left it. He went to
> school in Jakarta that had some Muslim studies (Christian as well).
> The right wing talk shows never called him a radical Muslim and it
> wasn't a focal point.
>
> Mitt Romney was looked into and attacked for his Mormonism, Huckabee
> was attacked
> and looked into for his Evangelical beliefs. Obama was no different,
> and mind you it was
> the right wing ppl. that made more of a brouaha with Romney &
> Huckabee. It wasn't a
> singular thing with Obama. It seems to me they did the same across
> the whole damn board.
>
> Like Obama's recent gaffe when he said in an interview "My Muslim
> roots".
> Some wacko's made a big deal out of it. I found those who made any
> inference of
> that pathetic. It was a slip of the tongue and could happen to
> anyone. Most ppl.
> just found it funny and laughed it off.
> --------
>
> About killing babies... I haven't heard him being called a baby
> killer yet and would never
> say it but he did vote against the "Born Alive Infant Protection Act
> ".
>
> Once the child has been expelled from the mothers womb after a botched
> abortion and the child is alive it was ok to deny medical care and
> let the
> infant expire.
> (I'm pro abortion but I can see how people would find something very
> wrong that.)
> --------
>
> He has had associations with Bill Ayers and was on the board of the
> Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
> A foundation founded by Bill Ayers.
>
> When Obama was questioned about his associations he said Ayers is "a
> guy who lives in my neighborhood"
> and not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.
> Which prompted more scrutiny and that's
> when they went for the Annenberg papers (which they tried to block).
>
> In 1995 Ayers hosted a fund-raiser for Obama prior to Obamas run
> for Alice Palmers seat in the state Senate.
> They both served on the board of the charitable Woods Fund of
> Chicago from 1999 to 2002.
>
> The same way you judge Palin by the holly roller church she goes to,
> they judge Obama on his church, associations
> (like they did with Pat Buchanan and Palin), voting record and
> education.
>
> All of the above are all based on his actions, association and life
> experiences.
>
> Cheers,
> Me
>
>
> At 08:40 PM 9/8/2008, Karen Weil wrote:
>> Oh, there's so many.
>> Like that he's a Muslim, that he was linked arm in arm with a 60s
>> radical, that he wants to kill children.
>> Exorcist, you're just sounding like another Bush/McCain apologist.
>> And "that's not change we can believe in."
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: The Exorcist
>> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
>> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 5:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [kj] palin ban
>>
>> Liiikeee? Once again you fail to inject any substance.
>> Cheers,
>> Me
>> At 08:19 PM 9/8/2008, Karen Weil wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean, like the ones spread about Obama?
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: The Exorcist
>>> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
>>> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 5:11 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [kj] palin ban
>>>
>>> Hmmm, I sound like a GOP operative because I'm against blatant
>>> lies and fictional
>>> ideas pulled out of thin air?
>>> Good to know.
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Me
>>> At 06:41 PM 9/8/2008, Karen Weil wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Because you just sound like a GOP operative; and if Obama had
>>>> done or said half of some of the things Palin did, you'd be going
>>>> ballistic.
>>>> Does Obama have his flaws? You'd better believe it. However, I'll
>>>> take those any day over McCain's any day. And maybe I'll stop
>>>> with the "invective" when you stop with yours.
>>>> Fair enough?
>>>>
>>>> kw.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: The Exorcist
>>>> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [kj] palin ban
>>>> Rather than throwing invective it would be nicer to have a reply
>>>> to my points.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Me
>>>> At 02:51 PM 9/8/2008, Karen Weil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, Exorcist: Why don't you just go work for her campaign?
>>>>> kw..
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: The Exorcist
>>>>> To: fluw ; A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 9:01 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [kj] palin ban
>>>>> Just like she did NOT ban any books nor did she try to IMPOSE
>>>>> creationism in classes
>>>>> I think it's quite fair to state that she would NOT ban KJ
>>>>> related stuff. If this is the most
>>>>> extreme stuff that you think exists you need to do a tad more
>>>>> reading.
>>>>> It's nice to make presumptions based on no facts but reaching
>>>>> for straws gets tiresome
>>>>> after a while does it not?
>>>>> At 08:33 PM 9/6/2008, fluw wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how many people on the gathering doubt if sarah palin were to
>>>>>> become aware of killing joke cd's or, (haha finally) a jaz
>>>>>> coleman book in a library, she would not have them banned?
>>>>>> as a killing joke fan, would you be apposed to this banning?
>>>>>> as your nations VP and following a very likely health failure
>>>>>> from Mc Cain, she would then be your president and the most
>>>>>> powerful nutcase in the world, are you comfortable with her
>>>>>> decision making?
>>>>>> or would you rather she just go back to running cliff's state
>>>>>> like a despot on a runaway train and get with a proper sex
>>>>>> reassignment surgery and promptly get on with giving her twin
>>>>>> wynona judd a stiff ass to mouth?
>>>>>> i vote for giving it to wynona
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Gathering mailing list
>>>>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>>>
>>>>> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of
>>>>> social Darwinism.
>>>>> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss
>>>>> is someone
>>>>> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore,
>>>>> losers contribute
>>>>> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is
>>>>> unethical, while
>>>>> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In
>>>>> the spirit of diversity,
>>>>> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no
>>>>> winners.
>>>>> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical
>>>>> team player.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gathering mailing list
>>>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gathering mailing list
>>>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>>
>>>> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of
>>>> social Darwinism.
>>>> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is
>>>> someone
>>>> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore,
>>>> losers contribute
>>>> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is
>>>> unethical, while
>>>> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the
>>>> spirit of diversity,
>>>> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
>>>> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical
>>>> team player.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gathering mailing list
>>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gathering mailing list
>>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>
>>> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social
>>> Darwinism.
>>> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is
>>> someone
>>> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore,
>>> losers contribute
>>> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is
>>> unethical, while
>>> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the
>>> spirit of diversity,
>>> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
>>> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical
>>> team player.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gathering mailing list
>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gathering mailing list
>>> Gathering at misera.net
>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>
>> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social
>> Darwinism.
>> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is
>> someone
>> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore,
>> losers contribute
>> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is
>> unethical, while
>> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the
>> spirit of diversity,
>> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
>> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical
>> team player.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gathering mailing list
>> Gathering at misera.net
>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gathering mailing list
>> Gathering at misera.net
>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social
> Darwinism.
> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is
> someone
> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers
> contribute
> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is
> unethical, while
> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the
> spirit of diversity,
> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical
> team player.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080909/fe9a4f9f/attachment.html>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list