[kj] Comrade Vlad Seizes Large Hardon
Change
crackedmachine at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Sep 11 05:56:08 EDT 2008
Why is comrade Vlad messin' in Tau Ceti?
Red Army should march on Switzerland / France forthwith.
Those froggies are usually a pushover, ask the grand old Duke of Wellington boots and his ten thousand merry men.
--- On Thu, 11/9/08, The Exorcist <killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com> wrote:
> From: The Exorcist <killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com>
> Subject: Re: [kj] Snopes.com new entry on Sarah Palin library book ban
> To: saulomar1 at yahoo.com, "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" <gathering at misera.net>
> Date: Thursday, 11 September, 2008, 12:13 AM
> How can anyone be against something known as
>
> THE ATOM SMASHER or THE SUPER COLLIDER?
>
> It's just pure awesomeness in of itself!
>
> If they do create black holes think how enviro friendly
> things will be.
> No matter dumps... Just trips to the black hole! Garbage
> disposal
> would be fun fun fun!
>
>
>
> At 04:00 PM 9/10/2008, sade1 wrote:
> > It makes sense, but since one side is playing the
> stability issue
> >(even making a scientist-rap video for Youtube) and the
> other side,
> >the press, hyping it that leaves some of the rest of us
> wondering.
> >
> >Meh, who needs 'stability' anyway... Fire away
> the LHC.
> >
> >... ... ... ... ... ...
> >
> >[looking at the current state of things]
> >
> >'Save me...
> > save me from Tomorrow..
> > I don't want to sail in this Ship Of
> Fools...!'
> >
> >
> >--- On Wed, 9/10/08, Brendan
> <bq at soundgardener.co.nz> wrote:
> >From: Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>
> >Subject: Re: [kj] Snopes.com new entry on Sarah Palin
> library book ban
> >To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the
> band!)" <gathering at misera.net>
> >Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 2:37 AM
> >
> >
> >ok; why?
> >
> >
> >To find out more about nature, which is pretty much
> scientists' brief.
> >
> >Specifically to prove / disprove big bang theory, find
> evidence for the
> >
> >higgs boson (theoretical particle that confers mass)
> and to find or create
> >
> >dark energy or matter.
> >
> >
> >It is intended to re-create conditions that existed one
> trillionth of a
> >
> >second after the (theorised) big bang. Which in the
> scheme of things is
> >
> >quite a long time after, future particle colliders will
> have to get to
> >
> >much higher power levels to go back closer to the
> theoretical big bang. As
> >
> >big as the solar system using the same technology, in
> order to re-create
> >
> >big bang energy levels.
> >
> >
> >Side note: yes it's expensive, but so is conducting
> wars, for example. And
> >
> >this technology often has unintended benefits. The WWW
> was invented at
> >
> >Cern...html and the first browser, Mosaic was developed
> for scientists to
> >
> >collaborate through. If you check the small print in
> whatever browser
> >
> >you're using you will most likely find Mosaic
> mentioned...Tim Berners Lee
> >
> >invented it in the late 80s.
> >
> >
> > >> The Large Hardon Collider has been turned
> on...
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The Swiss clearly have too much money.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > That thing is a WMD; if it backfires, it'll
> be one *ahem*
> >
> >'black hole' i
> >
> > > won't want to go into.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > That Large Hardon Provider "..will take
> scientists to within a
> >
> >split
> >
> > > second
> >
> > > of a laboratory recreation of the Big Bang,"
> ..ok; why?
> >
> > > from the article:
> >
> > > And full power is probably a year away. "On
> Wednesday we start
> >
> >small,"
> >
> > > Dr. "Who" James Gillies said.
> "today we are only aiming it
> >
> >at Mercury."
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > (I prefer the older
> >
> > > stick-shift model)
> >
> > >
> >
> > > ... ... ... ... ... ...
> >
> > >
> >
> > > [looking at the current state of things]
> >
> > >
> >
> > > 'Save me...
> >
> > > save me from Tomorrow..
> >
> > > I don't want to sail in this Ship Of
> Fools...!'
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --- On Wed, 9/10/08, Brendan
> <bq at soundgardener.co.nz> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > From: Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [kj] Snopes.com new entry on Sarah
> Palin library book ban
> >
> > > To: "A list about all things Killing Joke
> (the band!)"
> >
> > > <gathering at misera.net>
> >
> > > Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 1:07 AM
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Actually if you follow the logic of what I said,
> technically I AM calling
> >
> > > Americans thick (a=b and b=c, therefore
> a=c)...but you know what I mean.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Otherwise you're too thick to work it out
> anyway ;)
> >
> > >
> >
> > > PS: The Large Hardon Collider has been turned on
> and we're all alive!
> >
> >I
> >
> > > managed to get in a panicwank when someone
> reminded me it was T minus 10
> >
> > > mins ;)
> >
> > >
> >
> > >> Correct, religiosity is extremely high in the
> US and from what I
> >
> > >> remember
> >
> > >> it's also correlated with being thick.
> Can try to dredge the link
> >
> >up
> >
> > > if
> >
> > >> anyone is interested.
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >> Oh and I'm not calling Americans thick
> mind, rather religious
> >
> > >> fundamentalists.
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >>>> Outside f many fanatical Mid Easern
> religious states I cannot
> >
> > > think of
> >
> > >>>> a
> >
> > >>>> place where such an idea would get
> serious political
> >
> >tracttion.
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>> Almost eerie you say that, cuz the U.S.
> was recently ranked as
> >
> >the
> >
> > >>> most
> >
> > >>> religiously fundamentalist state on
> Earth, outside of the muslim
> >
> > > world.
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>> From: "B. Oliver Sheppard"
> >
> > > <bigblackhair at sbcglobal.net>
> >
> > >>> To: "A list about all things Killing
> Joke (the band!)"
> >
> > >>> <gathering at misera.net>
> >
> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:10
> PM
> >
> > >>> Subject: Re: [kj] Snopes.com new entry on
> Sarah Palin library book
> >
> >ban
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>> It's an embarrassing reflection
> of American political
> >
> >culture
> >
> > > that
> >
> > >>>> Snopes.com also has put up a new
> entry debunking a
> >
> > > widely-circulated
> >
> > >>>> email
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>> that says Obama literally fits the
> description of the
> >
> >Anti-Christ
> >
> > > from
> >
> > >>>> the
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>> Bible! That this idea is even
> seriously entertained is such a
> >
> >poor
> >
> > >>>> reflection on our country.
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>> Outside f many fanatical Mid Easern
> religious states I cannot
> >
> > > think of
> >
> > >>>> a
> >
> > >>>> place where such an idea would get
> serious political
> >
> >tracttion.
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>> But, alas, Snopes.com says
> Obama=anti-Christ rumor is false:
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>>
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/antichrist.asp
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>> Haha
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>> -Oliver
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>> Karen Weil wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> *Oliver:*
> >
> > >>>>> Thanks for sending this. I never
> really bought into that
> >
> > > (although it
> >
> > >>>>> does give one pause that there
> was even discussion of this
> >
> > > topic). I
> >
> > >>>>> still don't think much of
> this woman, and feel she is
> >
> >not
> >
> > >>> qualified to be
> >
> > >>>>> VP, but fair is fair.
> >
> > >>>>> Can we just hold the election
> today and get this whole
> >
> >f-ing
> >
> > > ordeal
> >
> > >>> over
> >
> > >>>>> with? ; )
> >
> > >>>>> Best,
> >
> > >>>>> k.w.
> >
> > >>>>> -
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >
> > >>>> Gathering mailing list
> >
> > >>>> Gathering at misera.net
> >
> > >>>>
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> _______________________________________________
> >
> > >>> Gathering mailing list
> >
> > >>> Gathering at misera.net
> >
> > >>>
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>>
> _______________________________________________
> >
> > >>> Gathering mailing list
> >
> > >>> Gathering at misera.net
> >
> > >>>
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > >>>
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >>
> _______________________________________________
> >
> > >> Gathering mailing list
> >
> > >> Gathering at misera.net
> >
> > >>
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > > Gathering mailing list
> >
> > > Gathering at misera.net
> >
> > >
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> >
> > > Gathering mailing list
> >
> > > Gathering at misera.net
> >
> > >
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >
> >Gathering mailing list
> >
> >Gathering at misera.net
> >
> >http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gathering mailing list
> >Gathering at misera.net
> >http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of
> social Darwinism.
> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your
> loss is someone
> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss.
> Therefore, losers contribute
> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a
> winner is
> unethical, while
> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective.
> In the
> spirit of diversity,
> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no
> winners.
> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an
> ethical team player.
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
More information about the Gathering
mailing list