[kj] OT: Science question

[sade1]

I'm not so sure......
 

> condoms promote promiscuity...


   That is putting the cart way before the horse. I don't think you can come up with one example where promiscuity
    is promoted, or one where denying of condoms made people become good boys and girls again. 


> promote...


   Condoms literally cannot promote anything. Impossible. All they can do is to facilitate more sex (frequency of, 
   not how indiscriminately one may choose to) by the user (giver and receiver).


> promiscuity...


   Rather, what condoms 'promote' [actually, facilitate only] is increased, even profuse, sex, and not promiscuity
   per se'.  Those are two different things, promiscuity being a moral issue as opposed to faciliting being a functional
   issue.


> promiscuity... is how AIDS spread...


   AIDS is spread much much more by irresponsible sex.  There are growing numbers now of people (mainly
   women, I think) who are faithful to their male partners and still become infected through no fault of their own.


> recreational sex advances S T I 's 


   More like, promiscuous irresponsible sex advances STI's.  A couple having recreational sex doesn't in itself advance STIs (as long as their tools and implements are properly cared for 8) ).

   And does the last sentence mean to imply that a married couple having sex for fun and not necessarily for procreation is somehow wrong? (I  am just asking, not provoking with that question).

 
... ... ... ... ... ... 

[looking at the current state of things..]
 
'Save me...
  save me from Tomorrow..
    I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'   





________________________________
From: Stephen Lawrence <stephen.l at live.com>
To: "gathering at misera.net" <gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 12:34:25 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Science question

i have no admiration for Any figurehead being it either political or religious but condoms promote promiscuity and that is how AIDS spread...nothing wrong with married partners making love and also attempting to procreate but recreational sex advances S T I 's 
 
________________________________
From: folk.devil at hotmail.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:09:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Science question

It is called sarcasm, Stephen. Do you normally agree with the Pope then? Is AIDs a myth?
 
________________________________
From: stephen.l at live.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:06:03 +0000
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Science question

do tell folk what's this LEECHING book from the 1600's then ?....are you an authoritory on it then?

 
________________________________
From: folk.devil at hotmail.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:01:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Science question

Do you think 'God' actually told him? Or did he get all his facts from a Leeching book from the 1600s?
He looks like the Grinch in that photo.
 NO CONDOMS!
________________________________
From: bq at soundgardener.co.nz
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:29:58 +1000
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Science question


  

PS: Pope Benedict is anti Harry Potter, anti rock and pop music (Satan worship) and has banned guitars from playing in any church. Which is a bit fresh from an 80-something year old virgin ex Hitler Youth, who actually looks more like Satan than most death metal band members…
 
http://therawfeed.com/pix/pope_benedict-he_sees_you_when_youre_sleeping.jpg
Nazi 
 

________________________________

________________________________
Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
________________________________
Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free. Try it Now!
________________________________
Rediscover Hotmail®: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry Check it out.
________________________________
Get the New Internet Explore 8 Optimised for MSN. Download Now 


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090413/a436e9db/attachment-0001.html>