[kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video

[sade1]

> share the "teabaggers"


Anyone else notice this? 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/14/david-shuster-nationwide_n_186815.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/09/rachel-maddow-ana-marie-c_n_185445.html

   It seems the 'teabaggers' in the media also 'went nuts' yesterday and couldn't keep from 'shooting off their own heads over how, ahem, "blue" 'in the face' they felt about government having, um, 'spent' itself into a hole where it would only get squeezed further by asians (countries) and other countries who want nothing more than to see the U.S. 'on its knees' 'looking straight down the barrel' of future...and on n' on n' on etce.tera.etc. ..




 
... ... ... ... ... ... 

[looking at the current state of things..]
 
'Save me...
  save me from Tomorrow..
    I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'   





________________________________
From: Karen Weil <karen.weil at sddt.com>
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 3:08:36 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video


Good point from Exo. While I may not share the "teabaggers" views, I fully support their First Amendment rights to speak their minds  -- just as I did with the anti-war and Bush protests, even though I often thought some of the criticism of him was ridiculous and actually not warranted. 
I think it's best everyone be civil (that's me, Pollyana ...)  ; ) 
 
k.w.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: The Exorcist 
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) 
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video
I was merely quoting your words. Maybe I put to much emphasis on words that
people say and should've thought "maybe he means protest or demonstrate"?
I did, but then wondered why the choice word of riot came up. I guess that sometimes
I'm just not so quick on the button. You'll have to forgive me.

I'll be responding to the astro-turfing in a bit.

It is amazing, however, that when one side protests is all for valid reasons. When they other side protests
it's all because they are a bunch of losers.

Will write more later (though I promise not to turn this into another 800 response email thread)
(Twisted the fuck outa my ankle and gotta ice it down right now. And on the first NICE day of 2009!)

Cheers Oli!


"> Since the Obama administration has cut taxes for 95% of Americans, 

> including the working and middle class, but has promised (yet has not 

> yet delivered) to raise taxes on income over $250,000 - to raise these 

> taxes to LESS THAN THEY WERE UNDER REAGAN, it means we are living in a 

> socialist, totalitarian society. So we gotta riot.

> 

> -Oliver"



At 10:35 AM 4/17/2009, B. Oliver Sheppard wrote:

Who said there were tea party "riots"???

I never did. I just pointed out the truth, which is that they are 'astro-turf' (fake grass roots), corporate directed anti-Obama events designed to give vent to sore losers from the 2008 POTUS election.


As far as the teabagging fests, which looked like the worst Sarah Palin rallies from last year, this man is my hero:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkOwsIIIe5I


He 'infiltrated' a tea party and actally said something that was true. He's got big bals for doing that, because most of the people at them are nuts. Accordingly, he gets booed.

-Oliver
_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090417/8ac49516/attachment.html>