[kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video
The Exorcist
killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com
Sat Apr 18 20:39:43 EDT 2009
I reference Huf-Po because....
"At 07:40 PM 4/17/2009, sade1 wrote:
P.P.S. And loads of offensive pictures, too:
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/10-most-offensive-tea-par_n_187554.html>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/10-most-offensive-tea-par_n_187554.html
"
I understand that you find all of it to be outrageous, I just don't
recall it ever being mentioned here.
The links are from 2003 and upwards. There are more links, but how
many shall I paste already?
The thing is, Huff-po and their ilk never made a stance.
Size might not be everything, but there are always extremists cooks everywhere.
However when the cooks are removed and you're left with the regular supporters,
what do you see? I see a big difference in tone.
As I repeatedly point out here, I think there is a massive double
standard as to what is allowed, what
is not allowed, who is allowed and who is not allowed. That is all.
At 07:55 PM 4/18/2009, sade1 wrote:
> > I wonder where your outrage and level of "offense" were about the
> following.
>
> I saw**/see them as offensive also. Outrageous is indeed a good
> word for them.
>
> **(weren't these posted here back in 2003, also?
> I don't recall who it was but the pics ring a bell..)
>
> > I don't recall Huff-Po being offended at any...
>
> I'm not a fan of the Huffing-Post (I'm not even sure exactly
> why you referenced them)
> so I couldn't recall their stance at the time...
>
> > I guess the "I'm offended" neurons must have been misfiring at the time.
> Whose, mine or someone else's? Au contraire, mon frere, mine
> perk up really quick at
> first hint of such stuff. I wouldn't even march where such
> banners were used.
>
> > So, single or minor idiot offender(s) vs. de facto large
> gathering of offenders.
> Neither, the former are bad enough and the latter are worse.
> There is a more relevant
> distinction (size[of group] isn't everything) i htink you're
> hinting at, the level of distaste or
> offensiveness of each group's placards(?) and if so, yes the
> Teabaggers were less
> offensive than the antiwar protesters.
>
>
>... ... ... ... ... ...
>
>[looking at the current state of things..]
>
>'Save me...
> save me from Tomorrow..
> I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'
>
>
>
>
>From: The Exorcist <killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com>
>To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
>Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 3:49:49 PM
>Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video
>
>Sade, Your outrage is duly noted.
>
>I wonder where your outrage and level of "offense" were about the following.
>(And this is all just a tiny smattering from one individual on the west coast)
>I don't recall Huff-Po being offended at any of these kind of
>rallies. I guess the
>"I'm offended" neurons must have been misfiring at the time.
>
>http://www.zombietime.com/sf_rally_february_16_2003/
>http://www.zombietime.com/sf_rally_march_20_2004/anti-american/
>http://www.zombietime.com/sf_rally_march_20_2004/anti-israel_pro-palestine/
>http://www.zombietime.com/sf_rally_march_20_2004/anti-bush/
>http://www.zombietime.com/marines_protest_berkeley_6-21-08/
>http://zombietime.com/gaza_war_protest/
>http://www.zombietime.com/iraq_war_fifth_anniversary_protest/
>http://www.zombietime.com/sf_rally_march_20_2004/anti-bush/
>
>Re: Gary Coleman...
>How about articles like these...
>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1584736,00.html
>http://www.cjr.org/politics/is_obama_black_enough.php
>http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-chude-sokei18feb18,0,7298828.story?coll=la-opinion-center
>http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,5335087.story?coll=la-opinion-center
>
>When you're done looking through the photos (a quick glimpse will
>suffice) look at the common theme
>between standard placards from the links I placed and the pic of one
>idiot with a Hitler sign that. Hell, don't
>forget to include Code Pink who decided to show up at one of the
>rallies as well.
>
>So, single or minor idiot offender(s) vs. de facto large gathering
>of offenders.
>
>At 03:39 PM 4/18/2009, sade1 wrote:
>> Did you see all the pictures? Each of the 3 visible images had
>> about 10 more
>>pictures you can scroll thru by clicking at the bottom right.
>>
>>"Them's fightin' werds."
>>
>> - Obama's Plan / White Slavery
>>
>> - The American Taxpayers are the Jews for Obama's Ovens
>>
>> - "Obama What you Talkin' bout, Willis?..." (say it
>> <http://mistaenkt.dk/Coleman.jpg>like Gary Coleman on "Diff'rent Strokes")
>>
>> - Obama Loves... Baby Killing
>>
>> - The new
>> <http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/1398/slide_1398_20069_large.jpg>face
>> of Hitler
>>
>> - pic of Uncle Sam being strangled from behind by a (black) Obama
>>
>> - Obama was sucking
>> <http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/1398/slide_1398_20110_large.jpg>Saudi
>> jewels
>>
>>These are all offensive to at least someone, somewhere, if not to everyone.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>... ... ... ... ... ...
>>
>>[looking at the current state of things..]
>>
>>'Save me...
>> save me from Tomorrow..
>> I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>From: The Exorcist <killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com>
>>To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
>>Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:44:14 PM
>>Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video
>>
>>Because the title says "offensive" pictures doesn't make it such.
>>Considering all the errr, protests form the *ahem* "other side"
>>this are quite tame.
>>
>>
>>At 07:40 PM 4/17/2009, sade1 wrote:
>>>P.P.S. And loads of
>>> offensive pictures, too:
>>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/10-most-offensive-tea-par_n_187554.html>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/10-most-offensive-tea-par_n_187554.html
>>>
>>>
>>>P.S.
>>>
>>>This MsNBC video of "Countdown" has allthe
>>>puns used by the media covering the Teabagging Partay,
>>><http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/30199155#30199155>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/30199155#30199155
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > share the "teabaggers"
>>>
>>>Anyone else notice this?
>>>
>>><http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/14/david-shuster-nationwide_n_186815.html>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/14/david-shuster-nationwide_n_186815.html
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/09/rachel-maddow-ana-marie-c_n_185445.html
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems the 'teabaggers' in the media also 'went nuts'
>>> yesterday and couldn't keep from 'shooting off their own heads
>>> over how, ahem, "blue" 'in the face' they felt about government
>>> having, um, 'spent' itself into a hole where it would only get
>>> squeezed further by asians (countries) and other countries who
>>> want nothing more than to see the U.S. 'on its knees' 'looking
>>> straight down the barrel' of future...and on n' on n' on etce.tera.etc. ..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>... ... ... ... ... ...
>>>
>>>[looking at the current state of things..]
>>>
>>>'Save me...
>>> save me from Tomorrow..
>>> I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>From: Karen Weil <karen.weil at sddt.com>
>>>To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
>>>Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 3:08:36 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video
>>>
>>>Good point from Exo. While I may not share the "teabaggers" views,
>>>I fully support their First Amendment rights to speak their
>>>minds -- just as I did with the anti-war and Bush protests, even
>>>though I often thought some of the criticism of him was ridiculous
>>>and actually not warranted.
>>>I think it's best everyone be civil (that's me, Pollyana ...) ; )
>>>
>>>k.w.
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: <mailto:killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com>The Exorcist
>>>To: <mailto:gathering at misera.net>A list about all things Killing
>>>Joke (the band!)
>>>Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:55 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Tender, moving YouTube video
>>>I was merely quoting your words. Maybe I put to much emphasis on words that
>>>people say and should've thought "maybe he means protest or demonstrate"?
>>>I did, but then wondered why the choice word of riot came up. I
>>>guess that sometimes
>>>I'm just not so quick on the button. You'll have to forgive me.
>>>I'll be responding to the astro-turfing in a bit.
>>>It is amazing, however, that when one side protests is all for
>>>valid reasons. When they other side protests
>>>it's all because they are a bunch of losers.
>>>Will write more later (though I promise not to turn this into
>>>another 800 response email thread)
>>>(Twisted the fuck outa my ankle and gotta ice it down right now.
>>>And on the first NICE day of 2009!)
>>>Cheers Oli!
>>>"> Since the Obama administration has cut taxes for 95% of Americans,
>>> > including the working and middle class, but has promised (yet has not
>>> > yet delivered) to raise taxes on income over $250,000 - to raise these
>>> > taxes to LESS THAN THEY WERE UNDER REAGAN, it means we are living in a
>>> > socialist, totalitarian society. So we gotta riot.
>>> >
>>> > -Oliver"
>>>At 10:35 AM 4/17/2009, B. Oliver Sheppard wrote:
>>>>Who said there were tea party "riots"???
>>>>I never did. I just pointed out the truth, which is that they are
>>>>'astro-turf' (fake grass roots), corporate directed anti-Obama
>>>>events designed to give vent to sore losers from the 2008 POTUS election.
>>>>As far as the teabagging fests, which looked like the worst Sarah
>>>>Palin rallies from last year, this man is my hero:
>>>>
>>>><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkOwsIIIe5I>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkOwsIIIe5I
>>>>
>>>>He 'infiltrated' a tea party and actally said something that was
>>>>true. He's got big bals for doing that, because most of the
>>>>people at them are nuts. Accordingly, he gets booed.
>>>>-Oliver
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Gathering mailing list
>>>>Gathering at misera.net
>>>><http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>>
>>>
>>>----------
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Gathering mailing list
>>>Gathering at misera.net
>>><http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Gathering mailing list
>>>Gathering at misera.net
>>><http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Gathering mailing list
>>Gathering at misera.net
>><http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gathering mailing list
>Gathering at misera.net
>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090418/039e441d/attachment.htm>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list