[kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

[Per G Olsson]

	Yup, that looks like Mickael Jackson's hands alright (minus the  
gloves he used to cover them up).

/Per

30 jun 2009 kl. 01.15 skrev sade1:


> What kind of Mole...the kind...you get in your garden..

>

>

> You mean it may have looked like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ 

> cupcakeprincess/3297033353/

> It is a Star(-nosed).

>

> ... ... ... ... ... ...

>

> [looking at the current state of things..]

>

> 'Save me...

>   save me from Tomorrow..

>     I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'

>

>

>

> From: Floren Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk>

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:08:57 PM

> Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

>

>

>  What kind of Mole are we talking about ?

> If it was the kind of Mole that you get in your garden, then it  

> would have been quite apparent .

>

>

>

>

> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:38:00 -0700

> From: saulomar1 at yahoo.com

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

>

> > ..it was all very his-word-against-the-other, with not a great  

> deal of evidence either way...

>

> A couple of other things of note..

>   -- maybe some parents accepted the money in lieu of a courtfight  

> so they can be done with it all and just be able

>      to  get their kid whatever therapy and help he'll need to  

> recover.

> -- also, as PW wrote here earlier, didn't one of the kids  

> accurately describe MJ's penis and its mole/s anyway?

>    I can't think of any other way he could do that, barring hearing  

> MJ describe it to someone else.

>

>

> ... ... ... ... ... ...

>

> [looking at the current state of things..]

>

> 'Save me...

>   save me from Tomorrow..

>     I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'

>

>

>

> From: Jim Harper <jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk>

> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)  

> <gathering at misera.net>

> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 7:44:24 AM

> Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

>

> I might take the money if the police/district attorney refused to  

> pursue the matter through the criminal courts; after all, it was  

> all very his-word-against-the-other, with not a great deal of  

> evidence either way, the kind of case the police/DA are wary of  

> taking on even without a megacelebrity involved. Getting a case  

> through the civil courts is easier than a criminal trial, because  

> the burden of evidence is lower. It worked with OJ. Besides, if  

> taking the money suggests the kids and their parents are lying  

> through their teeth, offering them money (as opposed to  

> definitively trying to prove his innocence) suggests Jackson was  

> guilty.

>

> --- On Mon, 29/6/09, ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:

>  I mean, if he fucked YOUR

> kids, wouldn't you want to kick his face in until it was nothing  

> more than mince & tiny bits of plastic?

> If you managed to stop yourself from doing that, wouldn't you  

> persue him relentlessly through the courts?

> Or would you just take a pay-off & be the money-grubbing scumbag  

> you always were?

>

>

>

> View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn more!

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090630/5c729903/attachment.htm>