[kj] [Bulk] Re: Top 50 songs of 2000-2010

[fatpotanga]

I totally agree.
the odd track shines but for the more part it just doesn't work for me to the point i can no longer listen to them.
Having said that, perhaps there's something that gets lost in translation & you really need to experience them live to 'get it'?

I find a lot of Jack White's stuff is hit then zzzzzzzzzz.
I genuinely believe he's a huge talent but find him a bit like celery; I really want to like it, will always give it a go, but can never decide if I enjoyed it or not.



On 20 Apr 2010, at 17:05, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:


> Yep, I've never really worked out why everyone seems to think they're so great.  They've always seemed pretty average to me - better than to listen to than most of the crap that's around, but not something I'd actually seek out / buy.

> 

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>

> To: 'A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)' <gathering at misera.net>

> Sent: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 4:39

> Subject: Re: [kj] [Bulk] Re: Top 50 songs of 2000-2010

> 

> I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that I think White Stripes are over-rated. Not bad, in fact quite good at times. But over-rated. Meg is god-awful on drums, the link posted to disprove that did nothing at all for me. Jack sounded fine, she just has NO TALENT and can’t even keep a beat. As far as being hot – she’s not. And If you’re gonna listen to music for that, you might as well go whole hog and listen to the Pussycat Dolls J

>  





-- 
YAY SALE!
http://www.iamscuzzy.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20100420/fa6459c1/attachment.html>