[kj] The war criminal Blair ?

[Jim Harper]

Yeah, 'cos Hussein hung on the words of the US ambassador all the time. You can tell from the way he withdrew his troops from Kuwait when told to and co-operated fully with UN weapons inspectors.
 
Oh wai- 

--- On Mon, 15/2/10, sade1 <saulomar1 at yahoo.com> wrote:








> The First Gulf war was legitimate 

 
   I remember reading that, among a huge yarnball of issues/smokescreens, the Kuwaitis (w/u.s. wink & nods)  drilled for oil on the iRaq side of the border with slanted-drilling gear on the Kuwaiti side (w/Brit. gear, confirmed by the manufacturer using said gear's serial numbers) - an illegal act of sovereign theft. 
   Then, when Saddam Hussein (after receiving from u.s. $3bil in agri-loans [read, military]) asked the US ambassador Glaspie the U.S. position on his plans to face off w/Kuwait, madame Ambassador (ambassatrix?) said, "the U.S. has no opinion on Arab/Arab conflicts..." Talk about greenlighting a tyrant to do whatever he wants, that was it. 
 
  So, basically, um, "somebody" was being 'Michael Vick' there, baiting both sides in order to get a damn good fight, and a boatoad of ill-gotten gains, out of the whole thing.
 
We've been living a hoax. someone's got us sussed.
 
.... ... ... ... ... ... 

[looking at the current state of things..]
 
'Who has the fun.. 
  ..is it always a man with a gun...? 
    Someone must have told him if you work too hard... you can sweat" 






From: Floren Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk>
To: gathering at misera.net
Sent: Mon, February 15, 2010 12:20:19 AM
Subject: Re: [kj] The war criminal Blair ?



 
 
The First Gulf war was legitimate , one of the conditions of the ceasefire agreement was that U.N. weapons inspectors can have full access to Iraq anytime they like and they can go where ever they wanted .
  Saddam refused to allow U.N. weapons inspectors into to some sites in Iraq .
This contravenes the ceasefire agreement and thus the second Gulf War was legitimate.
 
 


From: concrete_cookie at hotmail.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:16:39 -0800
Subject: Re: [kj] The war criminal Blair ?



#yiv1531256817 .ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
#yiv1531256817 .ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}

He just told you what war crimes Tony Blair committed

a war crime is:
starting a war based on a lie


get it?  






From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:19:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [kj] The war criminal Blair ?



#yiv1531256817 .ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
#yiv1531256817 .ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}

What war crimes did Tony Blair commit ?
 
A war crime is :
Dressing up in an enemies uniform
Killing prisoners
Not feeding prisoners
And there are a few other things that constitute a war crime. 
Do tell me why Tony Blair falls into the War criminal  category.
 
 
 

 

> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:42:40 -0600

> From: bigblackhair at sbcglobal.net

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Subject: Re: [kj] The war criminal Blair ?

> 

> Tony Blair IS a war criminal. I am with Jaz on this one. (So are Bush, 

> Cheney, Rumsfed, et.al, by the way.)

> 

> That isn't irrational, emotional hyperbole. It's a juridical fact.

> 

> The Nuremberg Principles, established by the US and its allies (England, 

> etc.) laid out clearly what constitutes a war crime.

> 

> For ex.:

> 

> Principle I. Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime 

> under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment..

> 

> Principle II. The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for 

> an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not 

> relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under 

> international law.

> 

> Principle III. The fact that a person who committed an act which 

> constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or 

> responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility 

> under international law.

> 

> The invasion of subsequent horror show in Iraq violated several UN laws. 

> The UN is a treaty of the U.S. and UK and is is int'l law - or , at 

> least, it is suppoosed to be regarded as such Not just invoked when 

> convenient by war hawks in first world countries.

> 

> Also see:

> 

> 

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Principles

> 

> 

> We could Nuremberg Principles selectively, sat, only to Japan and 

> Germany ca. 1945 - but God forbid they actually apply to our heads of 

> state as well! Blair, Bush, Cheney, and their enablers are all war 

> criminals.

> 

> -Oliver

> 

> 

> 

> Floren Luke wrote:

> > 

> > You fit the definition of a troll .

> > You made no contribution to the subject, you just name call.

> > You are the troll

> > 

> > 

> > 

> > 

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > From: dpeace at bigfoot.com

> > To: gathering at misera.net

> > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:16:54 +0000

> > Subject: Re: [kj] The war criminal Blair ?

> >

> > Troll.

> >

> > 

> >

> > Darren

> >

> > Hungerford, UK

> >

> > 

> >

> >

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering




Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now 


Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. 


Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free 

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20100215/da4be214/attachment.html>