[kj] "In Excelsis" on YouTube:
Alexander Smith
vassifer at earthlink.net
Fri Jun 11 06:59:09 EDT 2010
In 2010, does the chug even have any "commercial value"? Honestly,
did it ever?
Alex in NYC
On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:59 AM, nicholas fitzpatrick wrote:
> Maybe he's doing the chug here for commercial value and saving the
> bell for more choice moments on the album. But I fear we'll be
> disappointed.
>
> He hasn't rung the bell for over a decade, has he? (That's not meant
> to sound like a euphemism for jerking off).
>
> Maybe there was an echo of the bell on 'Dirt...', but that was it.
> I've been impressed with G's geetaring since then even though there
> has been a lot of chugging going on.
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:38:06 -0400
> From: vassifer at earthlink.net
> To: gathering at misera.net; gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] "In Excelsis" on YouTube:
>
>
> As much as I love a good chug (ooh..er...Missus), I have to agree
> with Todd here.... BRING BACK THE TWANG (i.e. THE BELL!)
>
> Alex in NYC
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fluw
> Sent: Jun 10, 2010 3:13 PM
> To: "'A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)'"
> Subject: Re: [kj] "In Excelsis" on YouTube:
>
>
> Geordie is soooo much more than chug 1234 greg.
>
> He is a master of arpeggios from another world and making single
> twangy notes hit like an anvil the size of Jupiter. For my money he
> does this way better than the little tiny bees in the jar chug which
> every pants shitting toddler can do.
>
> If Geordie’s legacy is too heavily weighted with memories of chug it
> will be an abomination, and he would surely be forgotten in short
> order.
>
>
> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net
> ] On Behalf Of GREG SLAWSON
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:13 PM
> To: gathering
> Subject: Re: [kj] "In Excelsis" on YouTube:
>
> Wow, people are really down on poor old Geordie. Correct me if I 'm
> wrong, but hasn't he pretty much been the master of heavy, dense,
> 4/4 downstroke guitar for the past 30 years (with the exception of
> some pop crap on BTATS and OTG)? I thought we liked that kind of
> guitar sound...
>
> From: fluwdot at earthlink.net
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:23:33 -0500
> Subject: Re: [kj] "In Excelsis" on YouTube:
>
> The bad:
>
> What? Why can’t kj learn that less is more, space is more important
> than yet another track of guitar buzz saturating and obscuring what
> came before it. The guitar has no body, no power, no point of
> existing. Why have Geordie play if what he creates sounds like a kid
> who just learned IV chords at a guitar center on a POD.
>
> 1234 1234 downstrokes for a groove…fucking lazy rudimentary and not
> interesting or inspiring…for robot dancers only.
>
> On the positive side:
>
> The voice sounds better then the past couple albums at least jaz
> isn’t trying to sound like a old warty toad possessed by a B movie
> villain.
>
> Youth doesn’t sound like he has in the mid 90’s
>
> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net
> ] On Behalf Of Rheinhold Squeegee
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:40 AM
> To: Gathering Gathering
> Subject: [kj] "In Excelsis" on YouTube:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq2EBh8OFV8
>
> For those who don't want to or can't download.
>
>
>
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
> inbox. Get started.
>
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
> inbox. Get started.
>
> Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail – Free. Sign-up now.
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20100611/a6abefbf/attachment.html>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list