[kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

[Alexander Smith]

This article is only one example, but if you read it.....

"Under the Gulf kingdom's strict Islamic Sharia laws, the death  
penalty can be imposed for murder, rape, apostasy, armed robbery, drug  
trafficking and repeated drug use."


Ahem....Apostasy: –noun, plural -sies.
a total desertion of or departure from one's religion,  
principles,party, cause, etc.


.....I'd say that pretty well falls under the umbrella of "disagreeing  
with them." Granted, that's head, not hands....though given the  
option, I think I'd prefer to lose my hands.

In terms of hand-dismemberment, Sharia law suggests it's the right way  
to deal with thievery, regardless of whether they were desperate,  
repentant or otherwise.....


But if you need further examples:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Penalties

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1226323/Iranian-police-ready-carry-hand-amputation-return-Sharia-punishment-criminals.html

http://www.survivalnet.org/articles/sharia.html


If you ask me, that's some pretty barbaric shit. Is there some  
barbaric shit in Christianity/Judaism? Absolutely, but let's not  
pretend all is sweetness & light under the watchful eye of Allah.



Alex in NYC


On May 8, 2010, at 12:13 PM, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:


> Yes, the Saudis behead people who commit capital offences.

>

> I couldn't find anything about cutting off your hands if you  

> disagree with them though.  (I only skimmed it though - did I miss  

> something?)

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Alexander Smith <vassifer at earthlink.net>

> To: jpwhkj at aol.com

> CC: gathering at misera.net

> Sent: Sat, 8 May 2010 14:36

> Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

>

> Oh, just a lovely little practice by a little-known coterie of  

> people called The Saudis

>

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2966790.stm

>

>

> Alex in NYC

>

>

>

> On May 8, 2010, at 8:21 AM, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:

>

>> Not as far as I know (but I've never disagreed with him in  

>> person).  But who does threaten to cut off your hands if you  

>> disagree with them?

>>

>>

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Alex Smith <vassifer at earthlink.net>

>> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net 

>> >; A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net 

>> >

>> Sent: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:44

>> Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

>>

>>

>> Does Dawkins threaten to cut your hands off if you beg to differ  

>> with him?

>>

>>

>> Alex in NYC

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Jim Harper

>> Sent: May 7, 2010 9:29 AM

>> To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)"

>> Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

>>

>> I'm sure Dawkins has a million and one convenient and pithy quotes  

>> about how right he is and why he's better than religious fanatics  

>> (which do all seem to revolve around the same method: "I'm right,  

>> so I'm not a fanatic!"). I'm already acquainted with Dawkins'  

>> beliefs, and they weren't convincing firsthand, so it's probably  

>> not worth throwing any more around.

>>

>> I'm also not even remotely religious, and heavily opposed to  

>> Christianity. What wories me is not the nature of someone's  

>> beliefs, but their attitudes. Dawkins is a fanatic because he  

>> doesn't admit a single shred of self-doubt. As far as he's  

>> concerned, he has satisfactorily proven his beliefs to be 100%  

>> accurate, and everyone who doesn't share his opinion is at best  

>> wrong and at worst actively delusion.

>>

>> That makes him a fanatic. That makes him just like any other  

>> fanatic, and entitled to be labelled as such. Like all fanatics, of  

>> course, he maintains he isn't one (because he's right, of course).

>>

>> jim.

>>

>> --- On Fri, 7/5/10, Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz> wrote:

>> “It’s all too easy to mistake passion that can change its mind for  

>> fundamentalism, which never will.”

>>

>> “If I sound intemperate, it’s only because of the weird convention,  

>> almost universally accepted, that religious faith is uniquely  

>> privileged“

>>

>> “Blasphemy is a victimless crime”

>>

>> Dawkins

>>

>> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net 

>> ] On Behalf Of Jim Harper

>> Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 10:23 PM

>> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

>> Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

>>

>> In other words:

>>

>> "Being a fanatic is only a bad thing if you're wrong. And I'm right."

>>

>> Thanks.

>>

>> The fallback position of the man who knows he can't prove his  

>> opinions: "But I'm right!"

>>

>> Jim.

>>

>> --- On Fri, 7/5/10, Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz> wrote:

>> Isn't virulent atheism just as much an issue as virulent Christian  

>> Fundamentalism?

>>

>> No. Nothing like it. I’ve done both.

>>

>> “When two points of view are expressed with equal force, the truth  

>> does not necessarily lie midway between them. It is possible for  

>> one side to be simply wrong. And that justifies passion on the  

>> other side”

>>

>> Dawkins 1:18

>>

>> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net 

>> ] On Behalf Of Bette Dillinger

>> Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 9:02 AM

>> To: gathering at misera.net

>> Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

>>

>> Really, your post is one of the few moderate, thoughtful posts I  

>> have read about Christianity on the Web!  I think the concepts such  

>> as "original sin" etc, are metaphors.  Taken out of context you can  

>> alter them to suit your personal level of need for control and  

>> submission or dominance.  But all books on spirituality ultimately  

>> have one theme.  That's why the "Founding Fathers" were deists,  

>> though of course I have views on that as well.

>>

>> What Cayce reading have you done?

>>

>> From: humanhybrid666 at gmail.com

>> Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 22:22:02 +1200

>> To: gathering at misera.net

>> Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) The Religion of Peace, Love and Understanding

>>

>> well, i've been rather anti-christian these last few years, very  

>> much so...altho, to me, divinity is everywhere...

>>

>> these last few weeks tho, i've been listening to 'the politically  

>> incorrect guide to the bible' which has opened my eyes to the fact  

>> that the christian mindset has given us many good things that  

>> society has benefited from... like the age of the magnacarta, and  

>> the attitudes of the american founding fathers who penned the  

>> declaration of independence ... i see how easy it is to slam the  

>> religious nutters, hardly a fair fight, but credit where its due,  

>> it has also had some positive effects on our unraveling culture.    

>> (not that peace cant be achieved without the bible..)

>>

>> there was one bit saying that those cultures that had large  

>> christian populations had more personal and political freedoms than  

>> those cultures with smaller christian based populations.. broke it  

>> down with numbers and stuff too...

>>

>> to each their own, as long as the mind and the conscience are used...

>>

>>

>> i am very interested in the initial cause/concept of the twisted  

>> biblical story of original sin... i have my own idea's, influenced  

>> by some edgar cayce readings,  and i do think that it does refer to  

>> some actual relevant happening, but, who can know??  doesn't stop  

>> me pondering...

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> =)

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> "due to a lack of trained trumpeters, the end of the world has been  

>> postponed indefinitely..."

>>

>> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from  

>> your inbox. Learn more.

>>

>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

>> _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>

>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

> =


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20100508/7283a397/attachment.htm>