[kj] ESS: the best single in decades?

[Per G Olsson]

P=0.10 is not deemed as a statistically significant outcome.  It's  
equal to something happening by chance 1 out of 10 times (as a  
comparison: getting three heads in a row when you flip a coin is 1/8  
or P=0.125).  If someone repeats the experiment and get the same  
outcome, then your'e talking...

/Per

1 sep 2010 kl. 20.06 skrev folk devil:


> "A 14% decline in serum PSA levels (P=0.10), but no change in  

> testosterone (P=0.70), was observed during the high soy diet in  

> contrast to the low soy diet.Conclusion:The high adherence as shown  

> by three measures of compliance in this pilot trial demonstrated  

> the feasibility of an intervention based on soy foods among free- 

> living men.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online  

> publication, 14 June 2006; doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602473."

>

>

> From: folk.devil at hotmail.com

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:00:48 -0700

> Subject: Re: [kj] ESS: the best single in decades?

>

> That's actually a myth.

>

> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:55:18 -0700

> From: saulomar1 at yahoo.com

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Subject: Re: [kj] ESS: the best single in decades?

>

> > ..Soy **

>

> Soy Drops Testosterone: http://board.crossfit.com/showthread.php? 

> t=9502

> but has plenty of Estrogen.

>

>

> **please to rethink original assumption.

>

> ... ... ... ... ... ...

>

> [looking at the current state of things..]

>

> 'Who has the fun..

>   ..is it always a man with a gun...?

>     Someone must have told him if you work too hard... you can sweat"

>

>

> From: Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>

> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)  

> <gathering at misera.net>

> Sent: Tue, August 31, 2010 7:56:29 PM

> Subject: Re: [kj] ESS: the best single in decades?

>

> We have Soy....WE HAVE!

>

> > Good point, but we are hungry. Unlike drunktards, we do not enjoy  

> Taco

> > Bell as it it was fine dining ;)

> >

> > CG

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>

> > To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

> > <gathering at misera.net>

> > Sent: Tue, Aug 31, 2010 3:05 pm

> > Subject: Re: [kj] ESS: the best single in decades?

> >

> >

> > Pontificating on the relative merits of the dribs and drabs of  

> material

> >

> > being released while the album release date is postponed over and  

> again is

> >

> > like like a group of hungry drunkards at an ineptly-run  

> restaurant picking

> >

> > out bits of bread from their teeth with toothpicks and comparing  

> them to

> >

> > meals of yore...interspersed with occasional comments like "right  

> I'm off

> >

> > to the chippie, text me when the mains arrive"

> >

> >

> >

> >>

> >

> >> I agree w/crazy Damon, I think it was, that In Excelsis is a  

> better,

> >> more

> >

> >> uplifting track with its beautiful simplicity...

> >

> >>

> >

> >>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:40:45 +1200

> >

> >>> From: bq at soundgardener.co.nz

> >

> >>> To: gathering at misera.net

> >

> >>> Subject: Re: [kj] ESS: the best single in decades?

> >

> >>>

> >

> >>> Well that's 4 nays so far. Keep em coming ;)

> >

> >>>

> >

> >>> > countessghoulita at aol.com wrote:

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>> > I am with you, Jon. My apologies to everyone. I love the  

> lyrics, but

> >

> >>> the

> >

> >>> > beats are too mainstream.

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>> > ++++++++++

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>> > I too find the track mediocre, mostly because the keys sound  

> very

> >

> >>> dated.

> >

> >>> > If I didn't know better, I would have said this was something  

> from

> >

> >>> 1984.

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>> > T.B.

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>> > _______________________________________________

> >

> >>> > Gathering mailing list

> >

> >>> > Gathering at misera.net

> >

> >>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> >>> >

> >

> >>>

> >

> >>>

> >

> >>> _______________________________________________

> >

> >>> Gathering mailing list

> >

> >>> Gathering at misera.net

> >

> >>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> >>                           

> _______________________________________________

> >

> >> Gathering mailing list

> >

> >> Gathering at misera.net

> >

> >> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> >

> > Gathering mailing list

> >

> > Gathering at misera.net

> >

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  

> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/ 

> gathering

> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  

> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/ 

> gathering

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20100901/ea2082ec/attachment.htm>