[kj] New Interview with Jaz Wherein He Discourses at Length on a Variety ...

[sade1]

There's that interview where he elliptically asserts that whatever the civil 
rights laws, that (private) business should not be bound by them and should be 
able to discriminate (for and) against the public as they, um, "see fit." Taking 
it to its logical conclusion, anything but anything private that is categorized 
as "for profit" in some way can thus be considered a commercial interest and 
will thus be empowered to DISCRIMINATE. 


Can't remember his other positions, but  can look into this even more.

D'oh! did I say discriminate? I think he may have wanted us all to hear-think 
"discern." Ha!





________________________________
From: "Devacor at aol.com" <Devacor at aol.com>
To: gathering at misera.net
Sent: Fri, April 8, 2011 3:25:15 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] New Interview with Jaz Wherein He Discourses at Length on a 
Variety ...


As in what are you referring to with Rand? Besides just media trying to slant 
things a certain way with him..

 
In a message dated 4/8/2011 2:36:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
saulomar1 at yahoo.com writes:

> ..He's actually pretty punk.

>

>So what the fuck went wrong? Did someone kick th fruit**, like, right the second 

>it fell from the tree?

> 

> 

>**Rand Paul 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110408/4a4afc66/attachment.html>