[kj] New Interview with Jaz Wherein He Discourses at Length on a Variety ...

[sade1]

In same video, he is as full of s
hit as shit can be from 7:10 on, 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3O2rBz9gwo#t=7m10s
 
I am truly sorry; I do not see the 'charm' (so to speak) of this man.





________________________________
From: "Devacor at aol.com" <Devacor at aol.com>
To: gathering at misera.net
Sent: Sat, April 9, 2011 6:24:43 AM
Subject: Re: [kj] New Interview with Jaz Wherein He Discourses at Length on a 
Variety ...


your 'analogy' is just based on your own personal opinion and speculation.

sure it made news, as it was a 'story' 
But he won his election- once it was explained out it, people had an 
understanding of what he was actually saying- where one agrees with his stance 
or not, the sensationalism was taken out of it and it became a non issue.
 something like george allen and his 'macaca' flap-- now that was something else 
and he sunk faster then a rock in water. that was an issue. 

  I'm not even saying im a Rand Paul supporter- im neutral on him, and im about 
in the middle on his statement- but to make it into something else is bogus. 


A


 
In a message dated 4/8/2011 9:30:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
saulomar1 at yahoo.com writes:
Fire may be bad, it may be good, may be used to create warmth BUT you never give 
the Pyro the Zippo. 


>

>The only time you wink-wink & a nod-nod for the pyro to be given the Zippo is if 

>you want his Pyromanic ass to have the Zippo, and of course it will always be in 

>a way that provides such enabler overly-intellectualized plausible deniability:

>                             "What, me? Oh no, i never thought he'd starta fire 

>- again. Nooo... I just thought he should have the same right to, and the actual 

>hands-on empowerment therefrom, owning a Zippo, like everyone else. (what can be 

>wrong with that?). I'm innocent." 

>

>

>And the media did jump on it, at least the tv morning news shows, the BBC tv 

>news here in US, on En Contexto (tv), online it was Cnn, Msnbc, BBC, Guardian, 

>Truthout, ReaderSupportedNews, and i think it may even have appeared on Deutsche 

>Welle news.

>It got coverage, alright. And I don't recall nor even inferred from the whole 

>mess that it was ever dismissed as a non-issue. 

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110409/7596045c/attachment.htm>