[kj] [kHz] (no subject) Hypothetical question
GREG SLAWSON
gregslawson at msn.com
Sun Feb 20 11:53:12 EST 2011
I disagree--I still think Hosannas has a sound and song selection that typifies what the Joke want to sound like. I look at
BTATS as more of a blip in their career, when they were tying to soften up and maybe even make a little cash. It's songs
are for the most part uninspited and unemeorable. At least Hosannas gets you fired up a little, despite its weaknesses (for
example, WWG sounding like Change, Lightbringer sounding like The Wait, and Majestic sounding like Communion, etc)
> From: vassifer at earthlink.net
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:56:09 -0500
> Subject: Re: [kj] [kHz] (no subject) Hypothetical question
>
>
> Nope. Without question, HOSANNAS = the worst Killing Joke album ever
> (and that includes Courtauld Talks as well). OTG may be HEROICALLY
> flawed, but at least there were some fleshed-out ideas on it (however
> misdirected).
>
> HOSANNAS is bereft of song.
>
> Alex in NYC
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Wessidetempest wrote:
>
> > I do like BTATS but it is the most dated sounding release (not
> > counting OTG). And Alex I think someone put a roofy in your coffee.
> > There is no way in this or any other universe that OTG is better
> > than Hosannas. As disappointed as I am with Hossannas it at least
> > has some of the best Geordie riffs ever.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Alexander Smith
> > <vassifer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> BTATS is worth re-discovering, I'd suggest, especially the re-
> >> release. OTG, meanwhile, remains as bad as you remember it (but
> >> it's still better than HOSANNAS).
> >>
> >> Alex in NYC
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Dominico C wrote:
> >>
> >>> OTG is crap, and BTATS I did honestly listen to 20 years ago, but
> >>> not any more. OTG and BTATS are the only 2 albums I don't own...
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message----- From: gathering-request at misera.net
> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:13 PM
> >>> To: gathering at misera.net
> >>> Subject: Gathering Digest, Vol 91, Issue 88
> >>>
> >>> Send Gathering mailing list submissions to
> >>> gathering at misera.net
> >>>
> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>> gathering-request at misera.net
> >>>
> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>> gathering-owner at misera.net
> >>>
> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>> than "Re: Contents of Gathering digest..."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Gathering - Digest
> >>>
> >>> Today's Topics:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Re: (no subject) Hypothetical question (folk devil)
> >>> 2. Re: (no subject) Hypothetical question (Paul Rangecroft)
> >>> 3. Re: (no subject) Hypothetical question (GREG SLAWSON)
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gathering mailing list
> > Gathering at misera.net
> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110220/52080c52/attachment.htm>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list