[kj] [kHz] (no subject) Hypothetical question

GREG SLAWSON gregslawson at msn.com
Sun Feb 20 11:53:12 EST 2011



I disagree--I still think Hosannas has a sound and song selection that typifies what the Joke want to sound like. I look at
BTATS as more of a blip in their career, when they were tying to soften up and maybe even make a little cash. It's songs
are for the most part uninspited and unemeorable. At least Hosannas gets you fired up a little, despite its weaknesses (for
example, WWG sounding like Change, Lightbringer sounding like The Wait, and Majestic sounding like Communion, etc)


> From: vassifer at earthlink.net

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:56:09 -0500

> Subject: Re: [kj] [kHz] (no subject) Hypothetical question

>

>

> Nope. Without question, HOSANNAS = the worst Killing Joke album ever

> (and that includes Courtauld Talks as well). OTG may be HEROICALLY

> flawed, but at least there were some fleshed-out ideas on it (however

> misdirected).

>

> HOSANNAS is bereft of song.

>

> Alex in NYC

>

>

> On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Wessidetempest wrote:

>

> > I do like BTATS but it is the most dated sounding release (not

> > counting OTG). And Alex I think someone put a roofy in your coffee.

> > There is no way in this or any other universe that OTG is better

> > than Hosannas. As disappointed as I am with Hossannas it at least

> > has some of the best Geordie riffs ever.

> >

> > Chris

> >

> > On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Alexander Smith

> > <vassifer at earthlink.net> wrote:

> >

> >>

> >> BTATS is worth re-discovering, I'd suggest, especially the re-

> >> release. OTG, meanwhile, remains as bad as you remember it (but

> >> it's still better than HOSANNAS).

> >>

> >> Alex in NYC

> >>

> >>

> >> On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Dominico C wrote:

> >>

> >>> OTG is crap, and BTATS I did honestly listen to 20 years ago, but

> >>> not any more. OTG and BTATS are the only 2 albums I don't own...

> >>>

> >>> -----Original Message----- From: gathering-request at misera.net

> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:13 PM

> >>> To: gathering at misera.net

> >>> Subject: Gathering Digest, Vol 91, Issue 88

> >>>

> >>> Send Gathering mailing list submissions to

> >>> gathering at misera.net

> >>>

> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

> >>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

> >>> gathering-request at misera.net

> >>>

> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at

> >>> gathering-owner at misera.net

> >>>

> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

> >>> than "Re: Contents of Gathering digest..."

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> The Gathering - Digest

> >>>

> >>> Today's Topics:

> >>>

> >>> 1. Re: (no subject) Hypothetical question (folk devil)

> >>> 2. Re: (no subject) Hypothetical question (Paul Rangecroft)

> >>> 3. Re: (no subject) Hypothetical question (GREG SLAWSON)

> >>

> > _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110220/52080c52/attachment.htm>


More information about the Gathering mailing list