[kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
Rob Moss
rob.moss at gmx.com
Wed Aug 22 18:12:41 EDT 2012
$50 and the baby dolphin lives......
Maybe Pete West is the son of John West the Tuna packer and he's out for revenge for having to make them change the it nets or something. Or nothing.
On 22 Aug 2012, at 19:17, "Brendan Quinn" <bq at soundgardener.co.nz> wrote:
> For god’s sake, stop killing baby dolphins Rob! (What will they eat in Japan if they run out…?)
>
> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On Behalf Of Rob Moss
> Sent: Thursday, 23 August 2012 3:57 a.m.
> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Actually Pete.
>
> He is.
>
> He officially owns the name I recall after the Murder Inc debacle.
>
> On 22 Aug 2012, at 14:26, F Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Jaz isnt Killing Joke, its up to the band to issue statements through the proper channels .
> Cormac needs to apply for the position of Killing Jokes manager or P.R before he makes statements on their behalf.
> KJ are quite capable of posting their own messages on Facebook, so its irrelevant whether Jaz has any comprehension of it or not.
>
>
>
>
> From: louiecipher33 at hotmail.com
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:19:17 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
>
> A drunken private rant ?
> I thought Jaz had already given up drink by the time he asked for the statement to be issued.
> Not Cormac's fault if Jaz has no comprehension of facebook
>
>
>
>
> From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:16:12 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> No, they are two separate issues , updating the Website and issuing messages are two separate things.
> My point was that if KJ wanted to cancel their tour , they can announce it in an official capacity after it being agreed on by all of them (KJ) , not after Jaz had a drunken private rant with someone .
>
> From: Per.G.Olsson at Miljonmysteriet.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:06:35 +0200
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Regarding #3)
> No, they're not - nor are their "management".
> Down by the river and the Cult/Mission/KJ Tour (still listed on the official KJ site, along with the Metropolis $$$gig & the gig cancelled in Sweden) are proof of this.
>
> /Per
>
>
> 22 aug 2012 kl. 14.54 skrev F Luke:
>
> 1. I didnt say that it was cormacs fault .
> 2. I dont believe that Jaz asked Cormac to distribute the message .
> 3 . KJ are quite capable of issuing their own messages .
>
>
>
>
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:31:46 +0100
> From: jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Of course it's Cormac's fault! He'll think twice next time Jaz gives him messages to distribute...
>
>
>
> From: F Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk>
> To: "gathering at misera.net" <gathering at misera.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012, 8:44
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> That is quite an exaggeration, Cormac hasnt been left to die .
> Maybe in future he should wait for KJ to make an official statement, rather than trying to speak on their behalf .
> Jaz has been left to pick up the pieces which were the result of Cormacs posts .
> Cormac should accept some of the blame for the whole fiasco , even so, Jaz didnt make any accusations or name anyone.
>
> From: fatpotanga at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:40:20 +0100
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Again, that's exactly how I feel.
> I couldn't care less about the 'chaos surrounds us get on with it' thing - we all know the unpredictability of the beast.
> It's the ridiculous cover up & such painfully embarrassing lies.
> Jaz being dressed as a woman & shoved on the lifeboat while pushing Cormac overboard to distract the sharks has left a very sour taste
>
> On 15 Aug 2012, at 23:44, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:
>
> No offence taken. Here's my viewpoint:
>
> Yes, it would be nice if you could rely on KJ to show up when they say they will. However, you can't.
>
> But that's not the thing that really gets me - which is the utterly lame excuses, and the idea that somehow it's just like that, 'cos it's Killing Joke, y'know.
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20120822/a3def7c9/attachment.html>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list