[LTPC-disc] LTPC issues

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:28:33 EDT

--part1_1d6.b473d46.2c175321_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear Doug:

I was with the company for over a year and a half and thought I found a home. 
 The fact that I have to start all over again and lose all renewals is bad 
enough.  We should be vested immediately, if not at 7% then some compromise at a 
lessor number but not ZERO.  Everything is negotiable.  We should be able to 
deliver and service policies.  That is what the applicant assumes and the main 
reason they bought in the first place.  They trusted us enough to apply and 
now it looks as if we lied to them.  Our integrity is at stake.  Are we liable 
for making promises to clients that we cannot keep?  Did we sell under false 
pretenses?

I can see what they are trying to do.  If we are not allowed to service our 
clients then why should we get renewals.  The bigger issue is being able to 
service our business.  Then I think the argument for renewals will fall into 
place and have some credence to it.

One more issue and then I am done.  I saw too many agents go outside the 
company and purchase their own leads and run up extra expenses.  On occasion I 
bought some leads and did my own advertising.  Not to be able to service these  
clients is wrong.  Not getting renewals on these clients is just not right.

Just my opinion.  But remember it is not good to dwell on this.  It is good 
to move on with opportunities out there.  But if we have a chance and a case 
then it should be looked into.

Good luck to all

Richard More

--part1_1d6.b473d46.2c175321_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=
=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">Dear Doug:<BR>
<BR>
I was with the company for over a year and a half and thought I found a home=
.&nbsp; The fact that I have to start all over again and lose all renewals i=
s bad enough.&nbsp; We should be vested immediately, if not at 7% then some=20=
compromise at a lessor number but not <B><U>ZERO</B></U>.&nbsp; Everything i=
s negotiable.&nbsp; We should be able to deliver and service policies.&nbsp;=
 That is what the applicant assumes and the main reason they bought in the f=
irst place.&nbsp; They trusted us enough to apply and now it looks as if we=20=
lied to them.&nbsp; Our integrity is at stake.&nbsp; Are we liable for makin=
g promises to clients that we cannot keep?&nbsp; Did we sell under false pre=
tenses?<BR>
<BR>
I can see what they are trying to do.&nbsp; If we are not allowed to service=
 our clients then why should we get renewals.&nbsp; The bigger issue is bein=
g able to service our business.&nbsp; Then I think the argument for renewals=
 will fall into place and have some credence to it.<BR>
<BR>
One more issue and then I am done.&nbsp; I saw too many agents go outside th=
e company and purchase their own leads and run up extra expenses.&nbsp; On o=
ccasion I bought some leads and did my own advertising.&nbsp; Not to be able=
 to service<B><U> these</B></U>&nbsp; clients is wrong.&nbsp; Not getting re=
newals on these clients is just not right.<BR>
<BR>
Just my opinion.&nbsp; But remember it is not good to dwell on this.&nbsp; I=
t is good to move on with opportunities out there.&nbsp; But if we have a ch=
ance and a case then it should be looked into.<BR>
<BR>
Good luck to all<BR>
<BR>
Richard More</FONT></HTML>

--part1_1d6.b473d46.2c175321_boundary--