[Scons-users] [scons-users] Support for Python 3?

[William Deegan]

Is building a local version of python 2.7 or 3.2 a barrier for people building software?

-Bill
On Jun 11, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Kenny, Jason L wrote:


> For me I see supporting 2.7 and 3.2 as a thing that has to be done, and will be needed for some time till the world moves more to 3.x as a default vs 2.x. 

> 

> AS far as I see stuff we build on RHEL4 boxes.. with a local build of the Python 2.7. This has been working fine for us. I just upgrade my mac systems to python 2.7 as well, and it working fine. 

> The issue for many people is not about having SCons using a 2.6 or 2.7 base version. It is about the other tools they may be using that do not support 2.6 or newer. This same reason is why we need to consider support 2.x and 3.x at the same time ( and try to do it in a way that might support jython and ironpython).

> 

> Jason 

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-users mailing list

> Scons-users at scons.org

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users