[Scons-users] problem while compiling in parallel
Jameel Shorosh
jameel.shorosh at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 02:57:53 EST 2013
Thanks !!!
On Friday, February 22, 2013, Kenny, Jason L wrote:
> Given the return code issue, you might want to look at the exitstatfunc
> value in Action(). ( look at the man page) This allows you to map return
> code to a way SCons wants to see them.****
>
> ** **
>
> This might be helpful for your custom compiler tool.****
>
> ** **
>
> Good luck!****
>
> Jason****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* scons-users-bounces at scons.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'scons-users-bounces at scons.org');> [mailto:scons-users-bounces at scons.org<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'scons-users-bounces at scons.org');>]
> *On Behalf Of *Jameel Shorosh
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:05 PM
> *To:* SCons users mailing list
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] problem while compiling in parallel****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi****
>
> Please ignore , i found the bug in my customized area (the customized
> compiler command was not always returning the right return code so scons
> was continuing the build to link phase although the compilation command
> failed.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks Anyway****
>
> Jameel
>
> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jameel Shorosh wrote:****
>
> I just saw now thatin the latest version of scons one defect was fixed
> that is related to multi-threading run, I am wondering if it is related to
> the my case:****
>
> ****
>
> """ From Alexey Klimkin:
> - Fixed the Taskmaster, curing spurious build failures in
> multi-threaded runs (#2720).
> """****
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Jameel Shorosh <jameel.shorosh at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi Jason,****
>
> Thanks for the reply.****
>
> ****
>
> regrading 1 - Please note that the compilation of one of the files failed
> and the linkage shouldnt have started at all.****
>
> regrarding 2 - no I dont use -k. (I feel it is somehow related to 1
> because things went out of synchronization****
>
> ****
>
> Jameel****
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Kenny, Jason L <jason.l.kenny at intel.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Problem 1: I only have seen this myself when there was something wrong
> with the depends tree. Well, I did see this once in windows ( which you are
> not using) because the tasked finished and the virus checker delayed the
> finial write or something to disk so it could check it. On Linux is has
> always been for me a bad depends tree.****
>
> ****
>
> Problem 2: Do you have –k in the command line?****
>
> ****
>
> Jason****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130222/0d381025/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list