[Scons-users] strange behavior with path as an array
robert zeigler
robert.zeigler at gmail.com
Thu Sep 12 16:18:03 EDT 2013
Let me put this another way.
If I had specified:
PATH=['/path1:/path2']
And I tried a clean build, and scons failed in a way that looked like:
sh: somecommand: not found
Then I would immediately think: "There's a problem with how I declared the
PATH" and go hunt through it.
Instead, the initial build works! It is only on rebuild that the problem is
manifested, and it is manifested in such a bizarre way that as a user,
checking the PATH declaration is about the furthest thing from my head.
And this is, imo, the bug. If it's unsupported, it should really be
unsupported: a clean build should fail. If it's supported, it should be
completely supported.
Robert
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:56 PM, robert zeigler <robert.zeigler at gmail.com>wrote:
> That should read:
>
> "I would much rather my build system fail early with a comprehensible
> error message about what's wrong with my build script."
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, robert zeigler <robert.zeigler at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Dirk,
>>
>> I realize the form is invalid, and I don't expect scons to support it. As
>> a user, my expectation is that scons would have detected the unsupported
>> form and thrown an error early. Instead, scons successfully built the
>> project (the first time) but evidently the hashed information about the
>> path is stored in a way that causes scons to think that targets are stale
>> when they are not. I would much rather my build system fail error with a
>> comprehensible error message about what's wrong with my build script.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11.09.2013 00:32, robert zeigler wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think I've uncovered an scons bug (or at least a not-well-documented
>>>> "feature").
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The problem is this line:
>>>>
>>>> path=['/usr/local/bin:/opt/**bin:/bin:/usr/bin']
>>>>
>>>>
>>> this isn't a supported form of specifying path lists in SCons (and we
>>> don't claim anywhere in our documents and manuals that it would be). For
>>> example, see section "4.3. Finding Libraries: the $LIBPATH Construction
>>> Variable" in the UserGuide where the correct forms
>>>
>>>
>>> If it is specified as:
>>>>
>>>> path='/usr/local/bin:/opt/bin:**/bin:/usr/bin'
>>>>
>>>> Or as:
>>>>
>>>> path=['/usr/local/bin', '/opt/bin', '/bin', '/usr/bin']
>>>>
>>>>
>>> are mentioned the first time.
>>>
>>> Since the offending form is not supported, it can't really be considered
>>> as a bug. Please use the other two methods, they should work as advertised.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Dirk
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>> http://four.pairlist.net/**mailman/listinfo/scons-users<http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130912/45ed44a6/attachment.htm
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list