[kj] Jaz Straw - veils/chastity belts/dark ages

[flight Bringer]

It's completely different to male circumcision. Males get  bits cut off 
which are surplus to requirements . Whilst females get active bits cut off
  Female circumcision is wholly unnecessary, because I can never find the 
f'kin  thing anyway . And when I do find it, it moves .


>From: "Juliet Pleming" <price-pleming at tiscali.co.uk>
>Reply-To: price-pleming at tiscali.co.uk,"A list about all things Killing Joke 
>(the band!)"<gathering at misera.net>
>To: "'A list about all things Killing Joke (the 
>band!)'"<gathering at misera.net>
>Subject: RE: [kj] Jaz Straw - veils/chastity belts/dark ages
>Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:33:11 +0100
>
>It's not like male circumcision which is also barbaric in my opinion and
>is carried out shortly after birth usually.
>
>It is carried out when girls are maybe 7, 8 or 9.
>
>There is a woman who travels around tribes doing it and so it depends on
>when she is visiting that area.
>
>Girls have their whole outer genital area cut away with a rusty old
>blade and no anaesthetic. They are then stitched together so there is
>just a small hole for them to wee through. This ensures that the future
>husband gets a virgin and the girl does not dishonour her father/family.
>Girls are usually married as soon as they start their periods as that
>means they have become fertile and a woman. Their father chooses the
>husband for them and it is a transaction between the men.
>
>On the wedding night the woman is 'openned' by her husband. She will
>then spend her life having babies etc.
>
>This operation can also cause terrible gynaelogical problems for women,
>etc
>
>I have read about this and have read first hand accounts from women
>themselves.
>
>
>Juliet
>

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters